Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Proposed Costco fuel settlement: $0 for class, $10M for attorneys.

What a wonderful world. Attorneys got paid and the "clients" got what?

http://centerforclassactionfairness.blogspot.com/2009/09/costco-fuel-settlement.html
Costco, along with other fuel retailers, has been sued over the way it measures gallons of fuel in some states. The putative class plaintiffs have settled the case--for zero dollars for the class, and ten million dollars for the attorneys.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

The lost Symbol

Just finished reading The Lost Symbol. If you want to kill some time, pick it up. If you want to spend time do some reading skip it. To quote others from www.goodreads.com
  • "A collection of ideas is not a plot."
  • formulaic
  • he wrote a book designed to hit you with made-up facts to support a made-up philosophy. 
  • His story-lines are choked with forced dialogue and contrived situations. His characters are one-dimensional caricatures who spend most of their time monologuing to explain to the dimmest of readers about what is happening and why. His formulaic and predictable plots are tiresome. 
Interestingly, New York Times did not hesitate to throw out all kinds comments that publisher would love to print on the jacket. 

    Friday, September 11, 2009

    Last Days of Lehman Brothers

    BBC release its version of the last days of Lehman brothers. More versions are available all over the world, as we approaching the anniversary of the collapse. One year already? It is only one year?

    Tuesday, September 08, 2009

    Leaked? Beatles on iTune, 9/9/09

    Rumors only so far. Let's wait another few hours.

    http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/08/did-yoko-ono-and-sky-news-just-ruin-apples-beatles-surprise/
    he story kicked off with the headline:
    “The whole of the Beatles back catalogue will be made available to buy on iTunes, Yoko Ono has told Sky News.”
    But almost immediately after publishing the story Sky News killed it, leaving nothing but a blank page in its wake. Google News had a cache of it for a brief time, but that too has apparently disappeared in record time. 9to5mac spotted the article and reached Sky News for more information, only to be told that the news organization was unable to comment.

    Friday, September 04, 2009

    History?

    An artist spend 16 years to paint the Nanking, 9:00 September 9th 1945 to reflect the Surrender of Japanese Forces.

    Compare this to the photo taken then:

    My question is who bowed to who?

    Why Good Managers Make Bad Decisions

    Excerpt from an WSJ Interview of Sydney Finkelstein.
    • Leaders tend to rely on past experience that seems useful, but is actually sometimes dangerous.  
    •  A second reason has to do with self-interest. Most people don't realize self-interest operates at a subconscious level. 
    •  The third one is what we call prejudgments. Leaders make prejudgments about their businesses that sometimes turn out to be wrong. 
    •  The fourth one is what we call attachments -- attachments to people or places or things. 
    And on  "What are some of the ways leaders can avoid making bad decisions?"
    People need to recognize that we are biased in every single situation. There's no such thing as objectivity.

    The first thing leaders should do to reduce their odds of making bad decisions is walk into an important decision situation saying, "Ok, I know that we are potentially biased in a variety of ways. Let's try to identify what those are."

    Second is to avoid the "yes man" trap. You have to bring different people and different data sources to the table. You want to add a "no team" to argue against the proposal, and put some teeth behind that no team.

    Positive thinking

    Seth posted his thoughts on positive thinking.

    [I]t's been shown over and over again that it improves performance over negative thinking.

    Key question then: why do smart people engage in negative thinking? ...
    The reason, I think, is that negative thinking feels good. In its own way, we believe that negative thinking works. Negative thinking feels realistic, or soothes our pain, or eases our embarrassment. Negative thinking protects us and lowers expectations.
    In many ways, negative thinking is a lot more fun than positive thinking. So we do it.
    If positive thinking was easy, we'd do it all the time. Compounding this difficulty is our belief that the easy thing (negative thinking) is actually appropriate, it actually works for us. The data is irrelevant. We're the exception, so we say.
    Positive thinking is hard. Worth it, though.
    I am not so sure that positive thinking is hard. An example would be the Endowment Effect. Sometimes, negative thinking is hard, when you have it, or already started it. Positive thinking is hard, when you don't have it yet, have not started it yet.

    Both are valuable. The million-dollar question is how to strike the balance.